Glasses and glass-ceramics and methods of making them

ABSTRACT

Phosphate glasses and glass-ceramics exhibit a positive percent kill as measured by United States EPA Test Method for Efficacy of Copper Alloy Surfaces as a Sanitizer and/or have a CIELAB L* value below 35, CIELAB a* and b* values within 5 of zero.

PRIORITY

The present Application claims the priority benefit of U.S. ApplicationNo. 63/088,525 filed Oct. 7, 2020 and U.S. Application No. 63/222,462filed Jul. 16, 2021.

BACKGROUND

Aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to unique glass andglass-ceramic compositions that have antimicrobial properties or otherbeneficial attributes. Other aspects include materials that include suchglasses and glass-ceramics as well as unique products including suchglasses and glass-ceramics. Still other aspects include method of makingsuch glasses, glass-ceramics, materials, and products.

Antimicrobial glass-ceramics can be integrated in products, such asarchitectural articles, such as panels, plates, buttons, and otherarticles to help control transmission of illness or for other reasons.In other products, such glass-ceramics may be ground into fine particlesor frit and added to composite mixtures, such as exterior paints, tocontrol growth of mildew or other microbes that may degrade coloring.Applicants believe that conventional antimicrobial glass-ceramicstypically include cuprite crystals, which may inhibit microbes, but maybe difficult to machine and/or may have a burnt orange color that limitsuse of the glass-ceramics in mixtures or arrangements of desired colorsthat are incompatible with burnt orange. Applicants believe a needexists for unique materials, such as glasses and glass-ceramics thathave antimicrobial properties and/or are convenient to machine intoproducts and/or allow unique mixtures or arrangements of antimicrobialmaterials and products in new or desired colors.

SUMMARY

Applicants discovered unique compositions and uses of glass-ceramics,some of which include antimicrobial properties. Further, Applicantsdiscovered compositions and uses of amorphous glasses, some of whichinclude single-phase glasses, and some of which include antimicrobialproperties. The glasses may be easier to machine than conventionalantimicrobial glass-ceramics. Furthermore, some of the glasses andglass-ceramics are not burnt orange in color, allowing for use of theglasses and glass-ceramics in different products, such as new coloredantimicrobial paints and architectural articles, such as push-plates.

Aspects of the disclosure include material comprising, in terms ofconstituent components over 30 mol % P₂O₅, at least 25 mol % CuO, and apositive amount of Fe₂O₃ up to 35 mol %. Other aspects include materialcomprising a positive amount of P₂O₅ up to 70 mol %, over 30 mol % CuO,and a positive amount of Fe₂O₃ up to 35 mol %. Still other aspectsinclude a phosphate glass comprising copper and/or iron, wherein P₂O₅,Fe₂O₃, and CuO constituents in combination with one another make up over50 mol % of the phosphate glass, and where the phosphate glass is fullyamorphous and single phase. In embodiments, the phosphate glass exhibitsa positive percent kill as measured by the United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) Test Method for Efficacy of Copper AlloySurfaces as a Sanitizer test disclosed herein and/or has a CIELAB L*value below 35, CIELAB a* and b* values within 5 of zero. Furtheraspects include a method of making a product including melting a batchmixture comprising 40 to 55 mol % CuO, 5 to 10 mol % Fe₂O₃, and 35 to 50mol % P₂O₅, fining the mixture; and cooling below 200° C.

Additional features and advantages are set forth in the DetailedDescription that follows, and in part will be readily apparent to thoseskilled in the art from the description or recognized by practicing theembodiments as described in the written description and claims hereof,as well as the appended drawings. It is to be understood that both theforegoing general description and the following Detailed Description aremerely exemplary and are intended to provide an overview or framework tounderstand the nature and character of the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The accompanying Figures are included to provide a further understandingand are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. Thedrawings illustrate one or more embodiments, and together with theDetailed Description explain principles and operations of the variousembodiments. As such, the disclosure will become more fully understoodfrom the following Detailed Description, taken in conjunction with theaccompanying Figures, in which:

FIG. 1 is ternary diagram including data according to exemplaryembodiments.

FIG. 2 is a scanning electron microscope image of a material surfacesurrounded by x-ray diffraction diagrams for locations on the imageaccording to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 3 is a scanning electron microscope image of a material surfaceaccording to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 4 is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIG. 3.

FIG. 6 is a digital image of the material of FIG. 2 on the left and thematerial of FIG. 3 on the right.

FIG. 7A is a scanning electron microscope image of a material surfaceaccording to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 7B is a scanning electron microscope image of the material surfaceof FIG. 7A, but at higher magnification.

FIG. 7C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 7A and7B.

FIG. 8A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample A of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 8B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 8A surrounded by x-ray diffraction diagrams for locations on theimage.

FIG. 8C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 8A and8B.

FIG. 9A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample B of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 9B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 9A.

FIG. 9C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 9A and9B.

FIG. 10A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample C of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 10B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 10A.

FIG. 10C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 10Aand 10B.

FIG. 11A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample D of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 11B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 11A.

FIG. 11C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 11Aand 11B.

FIG. 12A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample E of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 12B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 12A surrounded by x-ray diffraction diagrams for locations on theimage.

FIG. 12C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 12Aand 12B.

FIG. 13A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample F of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 13B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 13A surrounded by x-ray diffraction diagrams for locations on theimage.

FIG. 13C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 13Aand 13B.

FIG. 14A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample G of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 14B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 14A.

FIG. 14C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 14Aand 14B.

FIG. 15A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample H of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 15B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 15A.

FIG. 15C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 15Aand 15B.

FIG. 16A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample I of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 16B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 16A.

FIG. 16C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 16Aand 16B.

FIG. 17A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample L of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 17B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 17A.

FIG. 17C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 17Aand 17B.

FIG. 18A is a digital image of a sample of material, corresponding toSample M of Table 3 below, according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 18B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 18A.

FIG. 18C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 18Aand 18B.

FIG. 19A is a digital image of a sample of material (fractured andsupported by a clip), corresponding to Sample N of Table 3 below,according to exemplary embodiments.

FIG. 19B is a scanning electron microscope micrograph of the sample ofFIG. 19A.

FIG. 19C is an x-ray diffraction diagram of the material of FIGS. 19Aand 19B.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Before turning to the following Detailed Description and Figures, whichillustrate embodiments in detail, it should be understood that thepresent inventive technology is not limited to the details ormethodology set forth in the Detailed Description or illustrated in theFigures. For example, as will be understood by those of ordinary skillin the art, features and attributes associated with embodiments shown inone of the Figures or described in the text relating to one of theembodiments may well be applied to other embodiments shown in another ofthe Figures or described elsewhere in the text.

Referring to FIG. 1, constituents in the P₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO ternary spacemay be mixed together, melted, fined, cooled, annealed, and otherwiseprocessed (e.g., formed into sheets by float or fusion) to formmaterials, such as glasses, glass-ceramics, and conceivably ceramics orcrystals. Notably materials of FIGS. 2-5 are present in the diagram inFIG. 1. In embodiments, the materials may have other constituents, suchas contaminants or additives to facilitate manufacturing. According toexemplary embodiments, the materials are or include phosphate glasses,where the glass-forming substrate is P₂O₅, as opposed to silicateglasses, but in embodiments the materials may optionally include atleast some silica. The materials may be crystalline in embodiments, suchas over 90% crystalline, or may be amorphous glass in contemplatedembodiments. The materials may be dense in embodiments, such as over 90%dense, or may be porous in contemplated embodiments.

More specifically, according to exemplary embodiments the materials areor include phosphate glasses, where constituents in percentage of totalmoles (mol %) include at least 10 mol % P₂O₅, such as at least 15 mol %,and preferably in embodiments at least 25 mol % such as for improvedantimicrobial properties, such as at least 30 mol %, such as at least 35mol %, and/or no more than 75 mol %, such as no more than 63 mol %, andpreferably in embodiments no more than 50 mol % P₂O₅ such as forimproved antimicrobial properties. In embodiments, phosphorus is presentin the material as identified by x-ray diffraction, such as is shown inFIG. 2 for example. In contemplated embodiments, materials may have lessthan 15 mol % P₂O₅, such as none, or more than 75 mol %.

For clarity, mol % ranges herein refer to mol % as batch constituents,as analyzed such as by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy, andas analyzed with silica normalized out (see Table 1 below for example)unless specified otherwise, but the mol % ranges claimed herein bydefault are as analyzed unless otherwise specified. Also all rangesdisclosed herein as closed sets (e.g., at least X, no more than Y) alsoinclude and may be rewritten as open sets (e.g., more than X, less thanY), where boundary values are excluded in the range, or mixed sets whereeither boundary value is or is not included in the range.

According to exemplary embodiments, constituents in percentage of totalmoles (mol %) include at least some Fe₂O₃, such as at least more thantrace amounts, such as at least 1 mol %, at least 2 mol %, at least 2.5mol %, and preferably in embodiments at least 5 mol % such as forimproved antimicrobial properties, and/or no more than 50 mol %, such asno more than 38 mol %, and preferably in embodiments no more than 25 mol% Fe₂O₃ such as for improved antimicrobial properties, such as no morethan 15 mol %, such as no more than 13 mol %, such as no more than 10mol %. In embodiments, iron is optionally present in the material asidentified by x-ray diffraction, such as is shown in FIG. 2 for example.In contemplated embodiments, materials may have no Fe₂O₃ or more than 50mol %.

According to exemplary embodiments, constituents in percentage of totalmoles (mol %) include at least 15 mol % CuO, such as at least 25 mol %,at least 30 mol %, at least 33 mol %, and preferably in embodiments atleast 40 mol % such as for improved antimicrobial properties, and/or nomore than 88 mol %, such as no more than 80 mol %, and preferably inembodiments no more than 75 mol % such as for improved antimicrobialproperties, such as no more than 70 mol %, such as no more than 60 mol%, such as no more than 55 mol %. In embodiments, copper is present inthe material as identified by x-ray diffraction, such as is shown inFIG. 2 for example. In contemplated embodiments, materials may have lessthan 15 mol % CuO, such as none, or more than 88 mol %.

According to exemplary embodiments, materials are or are mostly ternaryin that the P₂O₅, Fe₂O₃, and CuO constituents in combination with oneanother make up the majority of the mixture (e.g., batch mixture, or asanalyzed), such as more than 50 mol %, such as at least 75 mol %, atleast 85%, at least 90%, but in contemplated embodiments the P₂O₅,Fe₂O₃, and CuO constituents in combination may optionally comprise lessthan 50 mol % and/or up to 100 mol %.

In embodiments, the materials are antimicrobial, where the material, ora surface of the material will kill or inhibit growth of microbesincluding bacteria, viruses, and/or fungi, but not necessarily that thematerial or the surface of the material will kill or inhibit the growthof all species microbes within such families (e.g., Staphylococcusaureus, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), but that itwill kill or inhibit the growth or one or more species of microbes fromsuch families. Further, the data in FIG. 1 indicates kill rates that maybe expressed as “log reduction” i.e. log (C_(a)/C₀), where C_(a) is thecolony form unit (CFU) number of the antimicrobial surface and C₀ is theCFU of the control surface that is not an antimicrobial surface.

Embodiments of materials, glass, glass-ceramics, and products disclosedherein exhibit a kill rate of greater than 0, such as 25% or more, suchas 50% or more, such as 75% or more, such as at least 99.9% (or a logreduction of 3 or greater) within 2 hours of exposure to Staphylococcusaureus under U.S. EPA Test Method for Efficacy of Copper Alloy as aSanitizer testing conditions (seehttps://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/oppad001/web/pdf/copper-copper-alloy-surface-protocol.pdf,incorporated by reference) as implemented below.

Bactericidal efficacy tests including study controls were performed asdescribed in the EPA test for efficacy of copper alloy surfaces as asanitizer. The test material (e.g. glass) coupons were prepared as 25mm×25 mm×1 mm coupons with polished surfaces. A 7 mil (0.007 inch,0.1778 mm) wet film thickness drawdown bar was used to form films ontoLeneta Scrub Charts (P121-10N). The films were dried for 2 days atambient lab temperature (approximately 25° C.) before the antimicrobialtest was conducted. Dry film thickness was around 80 μm. Stainless steelcarriers, used as reference, were cleaned and sterilized by immersion ina 75% ethanol solution followed by rinsing with deionized water. Vialscontaining Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) bacterial stock culturewere stored at −80° C. until use. 20 μL aliquots of thawed bacterialcultures were added to 10 mL of Tryptic Soy Broth (Teknova). Thesebacterial suspensions were serially incubated 3 times at 36° C. for18-24 hours in an orbital shaker (New Brunswick Scientific), and then 1time in polypropylene snap tubes (Fisher Healthcare) for 48 hours.Cultures were subsequently mixed on a vortex mixer (VWR Scientific) andallowed to settle. The upper two thirds of suspension from each tube wasaspirated and OD600 was measured (Smart Spec Spectrophotometer 3000,Bio-Rad) to estimate bacterial density. The culture was diluted withphosphate buffer saline (Gibco Life Technologies) to achieve a bacterialinoculum concentration near a target value of 1.0×10⁷ CFU/mL. 0.25 mL of5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco Life Technologies) and 0.05 mL Triton X-100(Amresco Pro Pure) were added to 4.70 mL bacterial suspension to aid inspreading the inoculum. Each test coupon was inoculated with 20 μL ofthe bacterial test culture. The inoculum volume was spread evenly usingbent sterile pipette tips (Mettler-Toledo) to ensure full and evencoverage, spreading as close to the edge of the coupon as possible.Coupons were then incubated in a controlled environment set at 42%relative humidity and 23° C. for a period of 120 min. Following the120-minute exposure period, coupons were neutralized in Letheen broth(Gen Lab). Ten-fold serial dilutions of the neutralized solutions wereplated using standard spread plate technique on Tryptic Soy Agar platesand incubated for 24 hours at 36° C. to yield countable numbers ofsurvivors (approximately 20-200 colonies per plate). Log and percentageof reductions for bactericidal efficacy tests measure differences inCFUs between stainless steel and test material (e.g., glass) containingcoupons. For the surface to be considered a sanitizer, a greater than orequal to 99.9% reduction (at least 3 log reduction) must bedemonstrated.

According to exemplary embodiments, both glass and glass-ceramicmaterials disclosed herein were sanitizers. As an example, a 3 logreduction equals about 99.9% of the microbes killed, shown as a diamondin the ternary diagram of FIG. 1 and identified as “BHB” and “BHE.”Other samples in the ternary had antimicrobial properties, with killrates above zero and less than 25% (asterisk in FIG. 1) kill ratesbetween 50 and 75% (letter “0” in FIG. 1), and between 75 and 99.9%(plus symbol in FIG. 1). Put another way, compositions in theFe₂O₃—CuO—P₂O₅ ternary system are disclosed herein that display a rangeof antimicrobial behavior from virtually no effect to full kill. Inembodiments, the materials can be fully amorphous and/or single-phasematerials, or phase-separated and/or partially crystalline. Compositionswith particularly effective antimicrobial properties (e.g., 3 logreduction or better) are shown in the ternary and include, in terms of %mol constituents, 40 to 55 CuO, 5 to 10 Fe₂O₃, and 35 to 50 P₂O₅, someof which are fully amorphous, single-phase glass and others of which arephase separated glass and/or glass-ceramic.

Amorphous microstructure may be is advantageous for applications thatrequire bulk parts because machining may be much easier than forcompositions that are surface-nucleated glass-ceramics. Such bulk partsmay include architectural products, such as push plates on doors andother high-touch areas in hospitals, schools, and office buildings.Furthermore, compositions of the ternary of FIG. 1 are black, thoughsome are burnt orange. Black color may be an advantage for applicationsthat require bulk parts. Still further, compositions disclosed herein,such as those of the ternary of FIG. 1 are phosphate glasses, butsurprisingly Applicants have discovered the materials can be formed andmachined under normal atmospheric conditions (e.g., room temperature,25° C. temperature, within 50° C. of 0° C., atmospheric pressure,101,325 pascals pressure, 50% relative humidity, open air).Manufacturing methods include forming the materials at such conditions.

FIGS. 2 and 3 show microstructure of BHB, a glass-ceramic material, andBHE, a single-phase glass, respectively. The lack of phase separation inBHE in concert with the full kill result is notable because conventionalglass-ceramic materials with antimicrobial properties are typically orexclusively phase-separated and contain Cu¹⁺ as cuprite crystals, andare glass-ceramics, as opposed to amorphous glass and/or single-phaseamorphous glass.

Referring to FIGS. 1-2 and 4 compositions disclosed herein includephosphate glass-ceramics and phase-separated phosphate glasses.Referring specifically to the sample BHB shown in FIG. 2, scanningelectron microscopy shows distinct phase separation, with a glassyphase, copper metal, and crystalline phases. X-ray diffraction shows thecompositions for the different phases differ from one another. Forexample, the copper metal of spectrum 28 is far different from theglassy phase of spectrums 29 and 30, as well as the spectrum 31 phase.Notably the glassy phase is a phosphate glass, as disclosed herein, butstill includes silica, possibly due to contamination from cruciblemelting. FIGS. 4-5 are x-ray diffraction measurements from a powdered1-inch by 1-inch polished coupon of BHB (FIG. 6 left) and BHE (FIG. 6right), and represent interior of the respective patty. Accordingly,FIG. 4 shows BHB contains copper metal and crystalline copper phosphatephase (potentially with iron), while FIG. 5 shows BHE is amorphous.

Referring to FIGS. 3 and 5, surprisingly Applicants discovered thatsubtle differences in constituents of the ternary of FIG. 1 compared tothose of BHB led to fully amorphous glass disclosed herein, such asexample BHE. FIG. 5 shows BHE to be amorphous. Compare the scanningelectron microscope and x-ray diffraction of FIGS. 2 and 4 versus FIGS.3 and 5. The later results are indicative of single-phase, fullyamorphous glass. Applicants believe fully amorphous glass in this systemand/or with the antimicrobial properties shown is particularly uniqueand surprising because conventional antimicrobial glass-ceramics rely oncuprite crystals to inhibit microbes and a fully amorphous glass,especially of single phase, may not be expected to function to inhibitmicrobes as disclosed herein. Without being bound to any theory, onepossible explanation for antimicrobial efficacy of single-phase, fullyamorphous glasses disclosed herein could be formation of a thin surfacelayer of copper oxide that kills or inhibits microbes. Such a layer maybe particularly thin, such as less than 10 μm in embodiments, and mayform by exposure of the glass to open atmosphere or may be facilitated,such as by heating in oxygen.

The melt and coupon (FIG. 6 left 1-inch by 1-inch square coupon) ofsample BHB show phase separation (see FIG. 2). Phases of copper metal,crystalline phases of iron, copper phosphate and glass were observed.The surface of BHB melt has a thin copper oxide layer. The melt andcoupon (FIG. 6 right 1-inch by 1-inch square coupon) of sample BHE didnot show any phases or apparent phase separation under any of theanalysis conditions (polished, fractured or ion milled) (see FIG. 3).The surface of BHE melt has a thin copper oxide layer.

The following Table 1 includes compositions measured using the UnitedStates EPA Test Method for Efficacy of Copper Alloy Surfaces as aSanitizer test disclosed above, compositions were measured withinductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. “StDev” refers to standarddeviation. Additional compositions were melted and yet not tested.

BFS BFW BGF BGG BGW BGZ Batched (mol %) CuO 15 15 25 25 40 45 Fe₂O₃ 25.534 15 10 10 10 P₂O₅ 59.5 51 60 65 50 45 Analyzed (mol %) CuO 16.8 16.428.6 29.1 38.8 41.3 Fe₂O₃ 24.7 31.7 14.4 9.8 7.9 8.2 P₂O₅ 58.5 52.0 57.061.2 45.7 39.9 SiO₂ 7.5 10.6 Analyzed (mol %)-silica normalized out CuO16.8 16.4 28.6 29.1 42.0 46.2 Fe₂O₃ 24.7 31.7 14.4 9.8 8.6 9.2 P₂O₅ 58.552.0 57.0 61.2 49.4 44.6 Sum 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 LogKill 0.05 −0.09 0.44 0.84 1.37 0.42 StDev 0.12 −0.15 0.02 0.12 0.04 0.08% Kill 9 −31 64 85 96 62 StDev 25 12 2 4 0.4 7

Copper BHA BHB BGQ BHE metal Batched (mol %) CuO 50 55 40 50 Fe₂O₃ 10 105 5 P₂O₅ 40 35 55 45 Analyzed (mol %) CuO 47.2 52.9 40.3 48.3 Fe₂O₃ 8.38.5 4.2 4.1 P₂O₅ 37.2 32.7 49.5 41.1 SiO₂ 7.2 5.9 6.1 6.5 Analyzed (mol%)-silica normalized out CuO 50.9 56.3 42.9 51.7 Fe₂O₃ 9.0 9.0 4.4 4.3P₂O₅ 40.1 34.7 52.7 44.0 Sum 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Log Kill 1.19 4.30.43 4.3 5.2 StDev 0.02 0.02 % Kill 94 100 63 100 100 StDev 0.2 1

According to exemplary embodiments, material disclosed herein has aCIELAB L* value below 35 on the scale of 0 black to 100 white, such asbelow 30, a CIELAB a* value within 5 of zero on a scale of ±100, such aswithin 3 of zero, such as within 1 of zero, and/or a CIELAB b* valuewithin 5 of zero on a scale of ±100, such as within 3 of zero, such aswithin 1 of zero. In embodiments the material is black. In contemplatedembodiments, the CIELAB L* value is at least 35, absolute value of a* isgreater than 5, and absolute value of b* is greater than 5, and/or someor all the CIELAB values are at least 10 away from burnt orange (50 L*,44 a*, and 61 b*). In embodiments, the material is otherwise colored. Inembodiments, the material is burnt orange in color. The following Table2 includes color coordinates for the BHB and BHE materials where L* isthe index that goes from black at 0 to white at 100, a* goes from green(−) to red (+), and b* goes from blue (−) to yellow (+), withmeasurement conditions: D65-10, % R MAV SCI UVC Color i7.

L* a* b* BHB Average 37.61 8.47 6.39 Stdev 0.11 0.46 0.37 BHE Average28.77 −0.04 −0.35 Stdev 0.35 0.02 0.12

According to exemplary embodiments, materials disclosed herein may havecopper and iron oxidation state distributions as described below.Determination of copper and iron oxidation state distribution: incontemplated embodiments, the samples are dissolved in the presence of aknown amount of Cr⁺⁶, in the form of K₂Cr₂O₇, which is in small excessof what is consumed by the reaction:3Cu⁺¹+Cr⁺⁶→3Cu⁺²+Cr⁺³The remaining Cr⁺⁶ is determined by titration with Fe⁺². The resultingvalue from the test is the total reducing power, i.e. Fe^(°2) and Cu⁺¹.This result is compared to the total possible reducing power, R, basedon the supplied estimated composition. The value of R can vary freelyfrom 0 to 1, with zero meaning no reduced species present and 1 meaningno oxidized species present. As such the larger the value, the morereduced is the glass. According to contemplated embodiments, materialsdisclosed herein have an R value of over 0.5, such as for materialshaving sanitizer and antimicrobial properties disclosed herein, such asover 0.55, over 0.6, over 0.65. In other contemplated embodiments, the Rvalue is 0.55 or less, such as 0.45 to 0.55, or over 0.65, such as atleast 0.7, at least 0.8, at least 0.9.

As indicated above, in embodiments, the P₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO materials mayhave other constituents, such as contaminants or additives to facilitatemanufacturing. Some materials include at least some silica, such asexamples BGW and BGZ in Table 1 above, which include 7.5 mol % and 10.6mol % SiO₂ respectively when analyzed, possibly due to contaminationfrom melting at high temperatures (e.g., 1350° C. for 5 hours) in quartzcrucible. Other examples in Table 1 included SiO₂ as a constituent.Accordingly, Applicants discovered that SiO₂ may be added to theP₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO materials, where resulting glasses and/or glass-ceramicsstill provide antimicrobial properties, as evidenced by Table 1 above.While such materials may be described as “mostly ternary” as disclosedabove, as SiO₂ is purposely added and in greater amounts, resultingmaterials may also be described as part of a P₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO—SiO₂ system.

Embodiments in the P₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO—SiO₂ system are all black, and fallwithin ranges of CIELAB parameters disclosed above. Embodiments in theP₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO—SiO₂ system may be processed (e.g., batched, melted,mixed, fined, drawn, annealed, etc.) to single-phase glasses and glassarticles (e.g., push plates, frit), such as where the glasses are fullyamorphous, such as through a bulk of the glass while possibly excludinga thin surface film as disclosed above. Embodiments in theP₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO—SiO₂ system exhibit full kill by the U.S. EPA dry test.Surprisingly, glasses in the P₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO—SiO₂ system, as disclosedherein, may be formed under normal atmospheric conditions, reducingcomplexity of manufacturing and environmental controls. Further, suchglasses may be machined under normal conditions with regularly usedsolutions (e.g., diamond saw, laser cutting, controlled fracture afterscribing, etc.).

According to exemplary embodiments, glasses in the P₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO—SiO₂system disclosed herein may still be characterized as “phosphateglasses,” where in such embodiments the mol % of P₂O₅ is equal to orgreater than SiO₂ and/or such that P₂O₅ is a primary or main networkformer of the glass. As disclosed above, composition constituents inpercentage of total moles (mol %) include at least 10 mol % P₂O₅, suchas at least 15 mol %, and preferably in embodiments at least 25 mol %such as for improved antimicrobial properties, such as at least 30 mol%, such as at least 35 mol %, and/or no more than 75 mol %, such as nomore than 63 mol %, and preferably in embodiments no more than 50 mol %P₂O₅ such as for improved antimicrobial properties.

However, as evidenced by examples BGW and BGZ in Table 1 above,Applicants have discovered that in embodiments, an amount of P₂O₅ can beoffset or reduced by inclusion of some SiO₂ as a constituent. Applicantshave found SiO₂ content can be used to control dissolution behavior ofglass. For example, P₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO—SiO₂ system glasses with higher SiO₂contents may exhibit lower chemical durability, which could be anadvantage for applications such as paint additives where fasterdissolution may be beneficial. As SiO₂ may be more readily available,substitution of SiO₂ for P₂O₅ may have efficiency and cost advantages.Furthermore, as evidenced by examples BGW and BGZ, Applicants find SiO₂in the glass expands options of equipment that can be used to process(e.g., melt and deliver) the glasses to include quartz and quartz-linedequipment.

As a constituent in glasses and glass-ceramics as disclosed herein, SiO₂may be non-zero, such as a positive amount of SiO₂, such as at least 1mol %, such as at least 5 mol % as shown in Examples of Table 1, such asat least 10 mol % as shown by example BGZ of Table 1, such as at least15 mol % as shown by examples Ex2.2, Ex2.3, Ex2.4, and Ex2.5 in Table 2,such as at least 20 mol % as shown by examples Ex2.3, Ex2.4, and Ex2.5in Table 2, such as at least 25 mol % as shown by examples Ex2.4, andEx2.5 in Table 2, such as at least 30 mol % as shown by example Ex2.5 inTable 2, and/or the amount of constituent SiO₂ may be less than 50 mol%, such as less than 40 mol %, such as less than 35 mol %, such as lessthan 33 mol %. Applicants found that compositions with SiO₂ contentsgreater than about 30 mol % may not melt well and or be easily pouredinto glasses, however in contemplated embodiments, glasses may havegreater than 50 mol % SiO₂.

The following Table 2 includes sample phosphate glass compositions withSiO₂ contents, according to exemplary embodiments, which have beenmeasured for antimicrobial efficacy. The examples in the table may bedescribed as mostly ternary, as defined above, or may be characterizedas compositions in the P₂O₅—Fe₂O₃—CuO—SiO₂ quaternary space. Notably,the examples of Table 2 exhibit full kill.

TABLE 2 Analyzed (mol %) Ex 2.1 Ex 2.2 Ex 2.3 Ex 2.4 Ex 2.5 P₂O₅ 40.836.7 34.0 31.9 30.9 Fe₂O₃ 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.0 CuO 46.1 41.6 38.5 36.135.2 SiO₂ 9.1 18.3 24.2 29.0 30.9 Log Kill 4.332 4.332 4.332 4.332 4.332StDev 0 0 0 0 0 % Kill 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 StDev 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0

Compositions of Table 2 were measured using inductively coupled plasmamass spectrometry are “as-analyzed” amounts are provided in mol %. Notethat each of the above examples in Table 2 have a log kill performanceof at least 3, such as greater than 3. Log kill and % kill of Table 2correspond to the EPA characterization disclosed above.

Referring to FIGS. 7A, 7B, and 7C, scanning electron microscope images(FIGS. 7A and 7B) and x-ray diffraction (FIG. 7C) correspond to glass ofEx2.5 from Table 2. Notably, the glass of Ex2.5 has the highestconcentration of SiO₂ from the examples of Table 2, essentially equalparts SiO₂ and P₂O₅, where either or both constituents were less thanthe molar percentage of CuO as analyzed. While FIGS. 7A and 7B are SEMmicrographs, the images appear generally featureless, similar to themicrograph of FIG. 3. Also, the micrograph of FIG. 7B is about 25 timesthe magnification of the micrographs of FIGS. 7A and 3, and FIG. 7Bstill shows no phase separation of the glass, precipitates, metal orcrystals (compare to FIG. 2). Accordingly, materials disclosed hereinmay be processed to be fully amorphous, at least through their bulk asdiscussed above, and may be characterized as single-phase glass that isnot phase-separated. This structure may be surprising orcounterintuitive given the antimicrobial performance of the materials,which may have been previously expected to have been related to presenceof copper-containing crystals or metal precipitates in a material.Similar to the x-ray diffraction of FIG. 5, x-ray diffraction of FIG. 7Cshows that the glass of Ex2.5 is single phase, amorphous.

In furtherance of the disclosure above and as evidenced by examplesdisclosed, material (e.g., glass, glass-ceramic) may include, in termsof as-analyzed and/or as-batched, constituent components: a non-zeroamount of P₂O₅ or other oxide or compound containing phosphorus, such asat least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol%, at least 35 mol %, at least 40 mol %, at least 50% and/or no morethan 80 mol %, such as no more than 70 mol %, no more than 65 mol %, nomore than 60 mol %, no more than 55 mol %, no more than 50 mol %, nomore than 40 mol %, no more than 30 mol %, no more than 20 mol %, or nomore than 10 mol % in contemplated embodiments; and a non-zero amount ofCuO or other oxide or compound containing copper, such as at least 15mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 25 mol %, at least 30 mol %, at least35 mol %, at least 40 mol %, at least 50% and/or no more than 65 mol %,such as no more than 60 mol %, no more than 55 mol %, no more than 50mol %, no more than 45 mol %, no more than 40 mol % in contemplatedembodiments.

In terms of as-analyzed and/or as-batched constituent components of thematerial, the sum of CuO and P₂O₅ may be at least 50 mol % of thecomposition, such as at least 60 mol %, such as at least 70 mol %,and/or less than 95 mol %, such as less than 90 mol %, such as less than80 mol % in embodiments. Further, amounts of CuO and P₂O₅ may becomparable to one another, such as where a difference (in absolutevalue) of constituent contribution therebetween in as-analyzed and/oras-batched quantities may be less than 30 mol %, such as less than 25mol %, such as less than 20 mol %, such as less than 15 mol %, such asless than 10 mol %.

As disclosed above and as evidenced by examples disclosed, the material(e.g., glass, glass-ceramic) may further include additionalconstituents, either as-batched or as-analyzed, such as at least oneadditional constituent (e.g., an oxide of iron, such as Fe₂O₃, an oxideof silicon, such as SiO₂) having a non-zero mol %, such as at least 0.01mol %, at least 0.1 mol %, at least 1 mol %, at least 3 mol %, at least5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol %, atleast 35 mol %, at least 40 mol %, at least 50% and/or no more than 80mol %, such as no more than 70 mol %, no more than 65 mol %, no morethan 60 mol %, no more than 55 mol %, no more than 50 mol %, no morethan 40 mol %, no more than 30 mol %, no more than 20 mol %, no morethan 10 mol % in contemplated embodiments for the at least oneadditional constituent.

Furthermore, the material may include at least two additionalconstituents beyond P₂O₅ and CuO, such as SiO₂ and Fe₂O₃, where eitheror any the at least two additional constituents have a non-zero mol %,such as at least 0.01 mol %, at least 0.1 mol %, at least 1 mol %, atleast 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 20% or moreand/or no more than 80 mol %, such as no more than 70 mol %, no morethan 65 mol %, no more than 60 mol %, no more than 50 mol %, no morethan 35 mol %, no more than 30 mol %, no more than 25 mol %, no morethan 20 mol %, no more than 15 mol %, no more than 10 mol %, no morethan 8 mol % in contemplated embodiments, or any combination of suchranges for the additional constituents such as 1 mol %≤Fe₂O₃≤15 mol %and 0<SiO_(2≤35) mol %, for example.

The constituents of P₂O₅, CuO, Fe₂O₃, and SiO₂ in sum with one anothermay make up a majority of the material, in terms of as-batched oras-analyzed mol %, such as where (P205+CuO+Fe₂O₃+SiO₂) is at least 60mol %, at least 70 mol %, at least 80 mol %, at least 90 mol %, and/orbut clearly not more than 100 mol %, such as not more than 99 mol % incontemplated embodiments, such as not more than 95 mol %, not more than90 mol %, or not more than 80 mol %, such as where additionalconstituents may be added to the composition. The amount of SiO₂ may bemore than Fe₂O₃; and/or constituents of P₂O₅, CuO, and SiO₂ in sum withone another may make up a majority of the material, in terms ofas-batched or as-analyzed mol %, such as where (P205+CuO+SiO₂) is atleast 65 mol %, at least 75 mol %, at least 80 mol %, at least 90 mol %,and/or but clearly not more than 100 mol %, such as not more than 99 mol% in embodiments, such as not more than 95 mol %, not more than 90 mol%, or not more than 80 mol %.

As disclosed above and as evidenced by examples disclosed, the material(e.g., glass, glass-ceramic) may characterized as a phosphate glass andaccordingly may have a substantial phosphorus component. For example,as-batched or as analyzed SiO₂ may be less than P₂O₅ as a constituent,such as by at least 1 mol %, such as at least 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %,at least 10 mol %, at least 15 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol% and/or not, such as where SiO₂ and P₂O₅ are about the same (e.g.,within 1 mol %). In contemplated embodiments, SiO₂ is greater than P₂O₅as a constituent component of the material composition, such as by atleast 1 mol %, such as at least 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 10mol %, at least 15 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol %.Similarly, as-batched or as analyzed SiO₂ may be less than CuO as aconstituent, such as by at least 1 mol %, such as at least 3 mol %, atleast 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 15 mol %, at least 20 mol %,at least 30 mol % and/or not, such as where SiO₂ and CuO are about thesame (e.g., within 1 mol %), or where SiO₂ is greater than CuO incontemplated embodiments, such as by at least 1 mol %, such as at least3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 15 mol %, atleast 20 mol %, at least 30 mol %. As indicated, Applicants find use ofsome SiO₂ to have benefits, but too much SiO₂ in phosphate glasses andglass-ceramics as disclosed herein can be difficult to process.

In furtherance of disclosure above and as evidenced by examplesdisclosed, material (e.g., glass, glass-ceramic) may include, in termsof as-analyzed and/or as-batched, constituent components P₂O₅ or otheroxide or compound containing phosphorus in amounts as disclosed aboveand CuO or other oxide or compound containing copper in amounts asdisclosed above. The sum of CuO and P₂O₅ (i.e. CuO+P₂O₅ in mol %) may besubstantial in the material, such as at least 50 mol % of thecomposition or other amounts as disclosed above.

Further, the material may include additional constituents, eitheras-batched or as-analyzed, such as at least one additional constituent(e.g., an oxide of iron, such as Fe₂O₃, an oxide of silicon, such asSiO₂) having a non-zero mol %, such as in amounts disclosed above. Asindicated above, constituents of P₂O₅, CuO, and SiO₂ in sum with oneanother (i.e. P205+CuO+SiO₂ in mol %) may make up a majority of thematerial, in terms of as-batched or as-analyzed mol % and in amounts asdisclosed above. With that said, the constituent(s) may be a constituentother than SiO₂, as disclosed above, such as Fe₂O₃ and/or differentmodifiers and other constituents such as MgO, ZnO, CaO, SrO, BaO, Li₂O,Na₂O, K₂O, TiO₂, NiO, MnO₂, and Al₂O₃ or combinations thereof. And, inat least some such instances as disclosed above, the material mayinclude at least two additional constituents beyond P₂O₅ and CuO, suchas SiO₂ and Fe₂O₃, such as in amounts disclosed above.

The following Table 3 includes additional example of materials (e.g.,glass, glass-ceramics) according to exemplary embodiments.

TABLE 3 Ana- lyzed (mol %) Ex. A Ex. B Ex. C Ex. D Ex. E Ex. F Ex. GP₂O₅ 40.4 41 39.8 39.4 38.1 40.1 41.4 Fe₂O₃ CuO 47.7 48.8 47.9 48.2 47.346.3 47.8 SiO₂ 7.1 5.4 7 7.8 9.9 8.8 6.1 MgO 4.8 ZnO 4.8 CaO 5.4 SrO 4.7BaO 4.7 Li₂O 4.8 Na₂O 4.8 K₂O TiO₂ Al₂O₃ NiO MnO₂ Single X X X X PhaseGlass Crys- X X X talline Cu present (phase- sepa- rated) Log 5.06 5.065.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 Kill StDev 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %Kill 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 StDev 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 Ex. H Ex. I Ex. J Ex. K Ex. L Ex. M Ex. N P₂O₅ 40 40.4 48.3 47.144.8 44.2 43.7 Fe₂O₃ CuO 47.3 48.4 45.7 48.0 49.4 50.0 50.5 SiO₂ 8 6.46.1 4.9 0.8 1.0 1.3 MgO ZnO CaO SrO BaO Li₂O Na₂O K₂O 4.8 TiO₂ 4.8 Al₂O₃5.1 NiO 4.8 MnO₂ 4.6 Single X X X X X X X Phase Glass Crys- talline Cupresent (phase- sepa- rated) Log 5.06 1.77 0.97 1.18 1.57 5.477 5.477Kill StDev 0.00 0.31 0.03 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 % Kill 100.0 98.1 89.293.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 StDev 0.0 1.3 0.9 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.0

Compositions of Table 3 were measured using inductively coupled plasmamass spectrometry and are in “as-analyzed” amounts provided in mol %corresponding representative oxides of elemental components. Note thatmany of the above examples in Table 3 have a log kill performance of atleast 3, such as greater than 3. “Log kill” and “% kill” of Table 3correspond to the EPA characterization disclosed above. “X” in thecategory of “single phase glass” corresponds to the sample being fullyamorphous and single-phase, while “X” in the “crystalline Cu present(phase-separated)” category corresponds to the example being aglass-ceramic with copper-containing crystals.

As demonstrated by examples in Table 3, among other disclosure herein,the material may comprise CuO and P₂O₅ in above disclosed amounts, plusan additional constituent, such as SiO₂, Fe₂O₃, MgO, ZnO, CaO, SrO, BaO,Li₂O, Na₂O, K₂O, TiO₂, NiO, MnO₂, and/or Al₂O₃, where the correspondingmaterial may display antimicrobial behavior, such as from fairlyineffective antimicrobial behavior to full kill by the U.S. EPA drytest. Interestingly, Applicants found binary CuO and P₂O₅ compositions(i.e. without additional constituents) in a similar composition rangemay not exhibit full kill, so at least one additional constituent (e.g.,modifier component) may help facilitate antimicrobial behavior of thematerial.

Such materials may be fully amorphous, single phase materials, such aswhere the additional constituent includes ZnO, CaO, SrO, Na₂O, andK₂O-containing materials, or phase-separated and partially crystalline,such as where the additional constituent includes MgO, BaO, andLi₂O-containing materials. As indicated above, microstructure ofamorphous compositions may be advantageous for uses that include bulkparts, such as door push plates and elevator buttons for architecturalapplications. Single phase amorphous materials may be black, within thecolor ranges disclosed above, and the phase-separated materials appearmottled orange and black. Such materials could be used for applicationsthat use antimicrobial powders or frit, such as additives for paint.Further, compositions of Table 3 are phosphate glasses, but thesephosphate glasses may be formed and machined under normal atmosphericconditions (e.g., under 50° C. (exterior to the forming equipment, suchas furnace), atmospheric pressure, zero humidity, open air).

Applicants have found Fe₂O₃ may be difficult for some melting and/orforming processes as Fe₂O₃ may easily alloy with metals used inmanufacturing processes. Using other modifier cations can beadvantageous for manufacturing. For example, some or all of Fe₂O₃ may besubstituted with R₂O as a modifier, where R is an alkali metal, such asLi, Na, and/or K. In other examples, some or all of the Fe₂O₃ may besubstituted with R′O as a modifier, where R′ is an alkaline earth metalor zinc, such as Mg, Zn, Ca, Sr, Ba, for example. Still, in embodiments,some or all of Fe₂O₃ may be substituted with Ti, Ni, Mn, and/or Al, suchas in the form of respective oxides thereof, such as TiO₂, NiO, MnO₂,and/or Al₂O₃.

In embodiments, a material, such as an amorphous glass, may include P₂O₅in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30 mol %), CuO in amounts asdisclosed above (e.g., >30%), and a non-zero amount of alkali metaloxide, such as at least 0.1 mol % (as-analyzed or as-batched), at least0.2 mol %, at least 0.5 mol %, at least 1 mol %, at least 2 mol %, atleast 3 mol %, at least 4 mol %, at least 4.5 mol % and/or no more than25 mol %, such as no more than 20 mol %, no more than 15 mol %, no morethan 12.5 mol %, no more than 10 mol %, no more than 8 mol %, no morethan 6 mol %, or no more than 5 mol %, where the alkali metal oxide maybe Li₂O, as shown by Example F of Table 3, Na₂O as shown by Example G,K₂O as shown by Example H, or another alkali metal oxide or anotheramount thereof (e.g., none or more than 25 mol %). In contemplatedembodiments, the modifier may include more than one alkali metal oxidewhere the sum of the alkali metal oxides is in such a range.

The alkali metal oxide, as evidenced by Examples F, G, and H of Table 3,may be combined with SiO₂ in embodiments, or in some contemplatedembodiments may be in materials that include P₂O₅ and CuO, but withoutSiO₂. For example, materials as disclosed herein may include P₂O₅ andCuO, in amounts as disclosed above, one or more alkali metal oxideconstituents, such as Li₂O, Na₂O, K₂O in amounts as disclosed above, andoxides of iron (denoted Fe₂O₃ for convenience) in ranges as disclosedabove. For embodiments with an alkali metal oxide modifier, Applicantscontemplate that ion-exchange strengthening of the glass family ispossible.

FIGS. 13A, 13B, and 13C, show material of Example F of Table 3, whichwas batched as 5 mol % Li₂O, 45 mol % P205, and 50 mol % CuO. As can beseen in the digital image of FIG. 13A, the material had a mottledcoloring, such as a mix of burnt orange and black coloring. As shown inthe micrograph of FIG. 13B, the material included crystals orprecipitates of copper-rich phase. At least some, such as most of thecrystals have a cross-sectional dimension less than 10 μm, such as lessthan 7 μm, and/or at least 100 nm, such as at least 0.5 μm. At leastsome, such as most of the crystals are located within at least 100 μm ofanother of the crystals, such as within 50 μm, such as within 10 μm,and/or no more than 100 nm, such as no more than 0.5 μm from the nearestother crystal. The crystals may be present throughout a bulk of suchmaterial, as opposed on only on the surface, or may be grown on thesurface through surface heat treatments, or on certain regions, but notothers, such as with regions with crystals removed by laser bleaching.As shown in FIG. 13C, x-ray diffraction evidences glass-ceramic,crystalline and glassy phases. The plot shows identifiable spikes (i.e.beyond noise) corresponding to crystals, such as at least one, at leasttwo, and/or such as a spike where Two-Theta is about 2.0853 deg, a spikewhere Two-Theta is about 1.8071 deg, and/or a spike where Two-Theta isabout 1.2788 deg (see also FIG. 12C), such as where “about” may bewithin 0.05 deg, such as within 0.025 deg.

By contrast, FIGS. 14A, 14B, and 14C show material of Example G, whichwas batched as 5 mol % Na₂O, 45 mol % P₂O₅, 50 mol % CuO. The digitalimage of FIG. 14A shows a uniformly colored sample, such as a blacksample within the CIELab color ranges disclosed above. Further, themicrograph of FIG. 14B and the x-ray diffraction information in FIG. 14Cshow the material of Example G can be formed as a single-phase amorphousglass.

FIGS. 15A, 15B, and 15C show material of Example H, which was batched as5 mol % K₂O, 45 mol % P₂O₅, 50 mol % CuO. The digital image of FIG. 15Ashows a uniformly colored sample, such as a black sample within theCIELab color ranges disclosed above. Further, the micrograph of FIG. 15Band the x-ray diffraction information in FIG. 15C show the material ofExample H, similar to the material of Example G, can be formed as asingle-phase amorphous glass.

In embodiments, a material, such as an amorphous glass may include P₂O₅in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30 mol %), CuO in amounts asdisclosed above (e.g., >30%), and a non-zero amount of alkaline earthmetal oxide and/or zinc oxide, such as at least 0.1 mol % (as-analyzedor as-batched), at least 0.2 mol %, at least 0.5 mol %, at least 1 mol%, at least 2 mol %, at least 3 mol %, at least 4 mol %, at least 4.5mol % and/or no more than 25 mol %, such as no more than 20 mol %, nomore than 15 mol %, no more than 12.5 mol %, no more than 10 mol %, nomore than 8 mol %, no more than 6 mol %, or no more than 5 mol %, wherethe alkaline earth metal oxide may be CaO, as shown by Example C ofTable 3, MgO as shown by Example A, SrO as shown by Example D, BaO asshown by Example E, ZnO as shown in Example B, or another alkaline earthmetal oxide or another amount thereof (e.g., none or more than 25 mol%). In contemplated embodiments, the modifier may include more than onealkaline earth metal oxides where the sum of the alkaline earth metaloxides is in such a range.

The alkaline earth metal oxide, as evidenced by Examples A, C, D, E, andB (for zinc oxide) of Table 3, may be combined with SiO₂ in embodiments,or may be in materials that include MgO, ZnO, CaO, SrO, BaO, but withoutSiO₂. For example, materials as disclosed herein may include P₂O₅ andCuO, in amounts as disclosed above, one or more alkaline earth metaloxide constituents, such as MgO, CaO, SrO, BaO, or ZnO, in amounts asdisclosed above, and Fe₂O₃ in ranges as disclosed above.

FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C, show material of Example A of Table 3, which wasbatched as 5 mol % MgO, 45 mol % P₂O₅, and 50 mol % CuO. As can be seenin the digital image of FIG. 8A, the material had a mottled coloring,such as a mix of burnt orange and black coloring. As shown in themicrograph of FIG. 8B, the material included crystals or precipitates ofcopper-rich phase. As shown in FIG. 8C, x-ray diffraction evidences thatthe material of FIG. 8A is a glass-ceramic, including crystalline andglassy phases.

FIGS. 9A, 9B, and 9C show material of Example B, which was batched as 5mol % ZnO, 45 mol % P₂O₅, 50 mol % CuO. The digital image of FIG. 9Ashows a uniformly colored sample, such as a black sample within theCIELab color ranges disclosed above. Further, the micrograph of FIG. 9Band the x-ray diffraction information in FIG. 9C show the material ofExample B can be formed as a single-phase amorphous glass.

FIGS. 10A, 10B, and 10C show material of Example C, which was batched as5 mol % CaO, 45 mol % P₂O₅, 50 mol % CuO. The digital image of FIG. 10Ashows a uniformly colored sample, such as a black sample within theCIELab color ranges disclosed above. Further, the micrograph of FIG. 10Band the x-ray diffraction information in FIG. 10C show the material ofExample C can be formed as a single-phase amorphous glass.

FIGS. 11A, 11B, and 11C show material of Example D, which was batched as5 mol % SrO, 45 mol % P₂O₅, 50 mol % CuO. The digital image of FIG. 11Ashows a uniformly colored sample, such as a black sample within theCIELab color ranges disclosed above. Further, the micrograph of FIG. 11Band the x-ray diffraction information in FIG. 11C show the material ofExample D can be formed as a single-phase amorphous glass.

FIGS. 12A, 12B, and 12C, show material of Example E of Table 3, whichwas batched as 5 mol % BaO, 45 mol % P₂O₅, and 50 mol % CuO. As can beseen in the digital image of FIG. 12A, the material had a mottledcoloring, such as a mix of burnt orange and black coloring. As shown inthe micrograph of FIG. 12B, the material included crystals orprecipitates of copper-rich phase. As shown in FIG. 12C, x-raydiffraction evidences that the material of FIG. 12A is a glass-ceramic,including crystalline and glassy phases.

In embodiments, a material, such as an amorphous glass may include P₂O₅in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30 mol %), CuO in amounts asdisclosed above (e.g., >30%), and a non-zero amount of modifier oxides,such as metal oxides, such as at least 0.1 mol % (as-analyzed oras-batched) of any such oxide, at least 0.2 mol %, at least 0.5 mol %,at least 1 mol %, at least 2 mol %, at least 3 mol %, at least 4 mol %,at least 4.5 mol % and/or no more than 25 mol %, such as no more than 20mol %, no more than 15 mol %, no more than 12.5 mol %, no more than 10mol %, no more than 8 mol %, no more than 6 mol %, or no more than 5 mol%, such as modifier oxides may be titanium (e.g., TiO₂) as shown byExample I, aluminum (e.g., Al₂O₃, alumina) as shown by Example L, nickel(e.g., NiO) as shown by Example M, manganese (e.g., MnO₂) as shown byExample N, or another modifier oxide, such as another metal oxide oranother amount thereof (e.g., none or more than 25 mol %). Incontemplated embodiments, the composition may include more than one suchoxide where the sum of the modifier oxides is in such a range.

FIGS. 16A, 16B, and 16C show material of Example I, which was batched as5 mol % TiO₂, 45 mol % P₂O₅, 50 mol % CuO. The digital image of FIG. 16Ashows a uniformly colored sample, such as a black sample within theCIELab color ranges disclosed above. Further, the micrograph of FIG. 16Band the x-ray diffraction information in FIG. 16C show the material ofExample I can be formed as a single-phase amorphous glass.

FIGS. 17A, 17B, and 17C show material of Example L, which was batched as5 mol % Al₂O₃, 45 mol % P₂O₅, 50 mol % CuO. The digital image of FIG.17A shows a uniformly colored sample, such as a black sample within theCIELab color ranges disclosed above. Further, the micrograph of FIG. 17Band the x-ray diffraction information in FIG. 17C show the material ofExample L can be formed as a single-phase amorphous glass.

FIGS. 18A, 18B, and 18C show material of Example M, which was batched as5 mol % NiO, 45 mol % P₂O₅, 50 mol % CuO. The digital image of FIG. 18Ashows a uniformly colored sample, such as a black sample within theCIELab color ranges disclosed above. Further, the micrograph of FIG. 18Band the x-ray diffraction information in FIG. 18C show the material ofExample M can be formed as a single-phase amorphous glass.

FIGS. 19A, 19B, and 19C show material of Example N, which was batched as5 mol % MnO₂, 45 mol % P₂O₅, 50 mol % CuO. The digital image of FIG. 19Ashows a uniformly colored sample, such as a black sample within theCIELab color ranges disclosed above. Further, the micrograph of FIG. 19Band the x-ray diffraction information in FIG. 19C show the material ofExample N can be formed as a single-phase amorphous glass.

Examples I and J from Table 3 include P₂O₅ in amounts as disclosed above(e.g., >30 mol %) and CuO in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30%),but only further include silica (SiO₂) and not any other modifier ormetal oxides. The log kill and % kill data in Table 3 shows that suchmaterials are effective antimicrobial materials, but not as effective atkilling or inhibiting microbes as other materials disclosed herein.Accordingly, in embodiments the material includes P₂O₅ and CuO insubstantial amounts, as disclosed above, and further includes a modifieroxide other than or in addition to silica, such as a metal oxide, wherethat modifier oxide may be an oxide of iron, zinc, an alkaline earthmetal, an alkali metal, titanium, aluminum, nickel, manganese, or otherelements, oxides, or compounds, as may contribute other metals orconstituents to improve the antimicrobial performance, color, strength,or other properties.

Applicants have found that certain modifiers in the composition, asdisclosed herein, affect chemical dissolution behavior and staining thatmay be caused by normal wear (fingerprints, disinfectants, etc.) uses ofthe materials as cover glasses, antimicrobial plates, frit, etc., andthat the compositional options disclosed herein exhibit full kill forvarious design needs. Further, as mentioned above, embodiments arephosphate glasses that may be formed and machined under normalatmospheric conditions, which allows for compatibility in variousexisting manufacturing and assembly processes.

For clarity, copper constituent in embodiments is listed as CuO hereinby the convention of defining the composition in terms of arepresentative or common-oxide constituent for a particular elementalcomponent, such as with respect to mol % of all various oxides of copper(e.g., CuO, CuO₂) in materials disclosed herein, including amorphous,single-phase glass. Similarly, oxides of iron are listed as Fe₂O₃ hereinby this convention, as well as other constitutes, but various oxidationstates of iron may be present in the given molar percentages listed.Notably, many materials disclosed herein contain at least twomultivalent elemental species, such as iron and copper, andoxidation-reduction (redox) of species may be difficult to breakdown atleast because of different multivalent species. So, unless otherwiseexpressly specified in claims or elsewhere herein, this convention isused.

With that said, Applicants believe that copper redox reaction mayinfluence antimicrobial and/or antiviral effectiveness of the materials,where efficacy of copper ions decreases with increasing oxidation statesuch that Cu⁰ performs better than Cu¹⁺ which performs better than Cu²⁺.According to contemplated embodiments, at least 0.1% of copper of thematerial (generally listed as CuO or cupric oxide herein above) is atCu¹⁺ and/or Cu⁰ oxidation state, such as at least 1%, at least 2%, atleast 4%, at least 7%, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, atleast 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, atleast 90%, and/or no more than 99.999%, such as no more than 99.9%, nomore than 99%, no more than 98%, no more than 95%, no more than 90%, nomore than 80%, no more than 70%, no more than 60%, or no more than 50%percent of all molar copper in the material. According to contemplatedembodiments, the ratio of Cu¹⁺ to Cu⁺² is at least 0.01, such as atleast 0.02, at least 0.04, at least 0.075, at least 0.1, at least 0.15,at least 0.2, at least 0.3, at least 0.33, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 5, 10,and/or no more than 200, such as no more than 100, no more than 70, nomore than 20, no more than 10, no more than 6.6, no more than 5, no morethan 3, no more than 2, no more than 1:1, no more than 0.9, no more than0.7, or no more than 0.5 in contemplated embodiments. Applicantscontemplate that the state of each species may be determinedindividually using Mossbauer spectroscopy.

Applicants have found that the process of annealing embodiments hereinnot only influences relaxation of internal stresses of the materials,but also internal microstructure. Annealing amorphous, single-phaseglasses disclosed herein by conventional or standard annealingpractices, such as returning the glasses to an oven and adding heat, andthen lowering the temperature over time, may result in formation ofcrystals within the glass, converting the glass to a glass-ceramic. But,pre-heating a graphite mold or other receptacle with comparablethermodynamic properties and then adding newly formed amorphous orsingle-phase glass of the present disclosure to the receptacle (e.g.,pouring in or placing on the receptacle) and allowing the glass to coolalong with the pre-heated receptacle in open atmospheric conditionsallows the glass to anneal, reducing residual stresses while stillallowing the glass to remain amorphous and single-phase. As such,compositions disclosed herein as amorphous and single-phase, such asexamples in Tables above, may also be annealed conventionally orpurposely heat treated to grow a crystalline phase and convert the glassto a glass-ceramic, or may be annealed as disclosed and to be amorphousand single-phase glass, such as glass articles as disclosed.

Each of U.S. Application No. 63/023,518 filed May 12, 2020, Ser. No.17/327,870 filed May 24, 2021, 63/088,525 filed Oct. 7, 2020, Ser. No.17/068,272 filed Oct. 12, 2020, 63/136,381 filed Jan. 12, 2021,63/151,210 filed Feb. 19, 2021, 63/177,536 filed Apr. 21, 2021,63/209,489 filed May 11, 2021, 63/123,863 filed Dec. 10, 2020,63/183,292 filed May 3, 2021, 63/183,271 filed May 3, 2021, and63/222,462 filed Jul. 16, 2021 is incorporated by reference herein inits entirety. Each of U.S. Application No. 63/030,719 filed May 27,2020, Ser. No. 17/331,050 filed May 26, 2021, 63/024,835 filed May 14,2020, Ser. No. 17/319,538 filed May 13, 2021, and 63/009,102 filed Apr.13, 2020 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.International application No. PCT/US21/24605 filed Mar. 29, 2021 isincorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

Construction and arrangements of the compositions, structures,assemblies, and structures, as shown in the various exemplaryembodiments, are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments havebeen described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications arepossible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes, andproportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mountingarrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations) without materiallydeparting from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matterdescribed herein. Materials disclosed herein may be useful for purposesother than controlling microbes, such as forming substrates, packaging,containers, covers, etc. The order or sequence of any process, logicalalgorithm, or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according toexemplary embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes andomissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions andarrangement of the various exemplary embodiments without departing fromthe scope of the present inventive technology.

What is claimed is:
 1. A material, in terms of as-analyzed constituentcomponents, comprising: 40 mol %≤P₂O₅≤70 mol %; 25 mol %≤CuO≤55 mol %;and 5 mol %≤Fe₂O₃≤15 mol, wherein the material is an amorphous,single-phase glass.
 2. Material of claim 1, wherein 40 mol %≤CuO≤55 mol%.
 3. Material of claim 1, further comprising 0≤SiO₂≤35 mol %. 4.Material of claim 1, wherein the glass is annealed.
 5. Material of claim1, exhibiting a percent kill of at least 75 as measured by United StatesEPA Test Method for Efficacy of Copper Alloy Surfaces as a Sanitizer. 6.Material of claim 1, exhibiting a CIELAB L* value below
 35. 7. Materialof claim 6, exhibiting a CIELAB a* value is within 5 of zero. 8.Material of claim 7, exhibiting a CIELAB b* value is within 5 of zero.9. Material of claim 1, exhibiting a black color.
 10. Frit comprisingmaterial of claim
 1. 11. A surface of an article, the surface comprisingmaterial claim
 1. 12. A material, in terms of as-analyzed constituentcomponents, comprising: 30 mol %≤P₂O₅≤65 mol %; 25 mol %≤CuO≤55 mol %;0≤SiO₂≤35 mol %; and 3 mol %≤X≤15 mol %, where X is one or moreconstituents selected from the group consisting of Fe₂O₃, MgO, ZnO, CaO,SrO, BaO, Li₂O, Na₂O, K₂O, TiO₂, NiO, MnO₂, and Al₂O₃; wherein thematerial exhibits a percent kill of at least 75 as measured by UnitedStates EPA Test Method for Efficacy of Copper Alloy Surfaces as aSanitizer.
 13. The material of claim 12, wherein X is Fe₂O₃.
 14. Thematerial of claim 13, wherein 40 mol %≤P₂O₅≤65 mol %, and wherein 40 mol%≤CuO≤55 mol %.
 15. A material, in terms of as-analyzed constituentcomponents, comprising: 40 mol %≤P₂O₅≤70 mol %; 25 mol %≤CuO≤55 mol %;and 5 mol %≤Fe₂O₃≤15 mol %, wherein the material is glass orglass-ceramic.
 16. The material of claim 15, wherein 40 mol %≤CuO≤55 mol%.
 17. The material of claim 15, wherein the material is an amorphousglass and at a temperature within 50° C. of 0° C.
 18. The material ofclaim 15, wherein the material is a single-phase glass and at atemperature within 50° C. of 0° C.
 19. The material of claim 15, furthercomprising 0<SiO₂≤35 mol %.
 20. Frit comprising the material of claim15.
 21. A surface of an article, the surface comprising the materialclaim
 15. 22. A material, in terms of as-analyzed constituentcomponents, comprising: 35 mol %≤P₂O₅≤70 mol %; 25 mol %≤CuO≤55 mol % 40mol %≤CuO≤55 mol %; and 2.5 mol %≤Fe₂O₃≤25 mol, wherein the material isan amorphous, single-phase glass.
 23. Material of claim 22, furthercomprising 0<SiO₂≤35 mol %.
 24. Material of claim 23, wherein SiO₂≤P₂O₅.25. Frit comprising the material of claim
 22. 26. A surface of anarticle, the surface comprising the material claim 22.